TOPIC:

mikeh wrote: I reckon Ash would be more use assisting Harding with the coaching of the existing forward line tomorrow

I think that one of your squad will be hoping that Mike....I'd hate to be the one that lost my spot to a 'blow in'. It wouldn't do lot for the morale of the club.

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: I reckon Ash would be more use assisting Harding with the coaching of the existing forward line tomorrow

I think that one of your squad will be hoping that Mike....I'd hate to be the one that lost my spot to a 'blow in'. It wouldn't do lot for the morale of the club.

Hardley a blow in ya clown! He is a 99 game champ of the club with 284 gls

Swandog wrote:

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: I reckon Ash would be more use assisting Harding with the coaching of the existing forward line tomorrow

I think that one of your squad will be hoping that Mike....I'd hate to be the one that lost my spot to a 'blow in'. It wouldn't do lot for the morale of the club.

Hardley a blow in ya clown! He is a 99 game champ of the club with 284 gls

Hasn't played or been interested in playing all year - makes him a blow in ya clown!

Even though we lost, Harding made the right decision not to play him. It wouldn't have made any difference to the result.

mikeh wrote: Even though we lost, Harding made the right decision not to play him. It wouldn't have made any difference to the result.

Bit of a pity your boys kept "them" in the finals Mike, but I guess we'll have to get used to it for the foreseeable future.

58shark wrote:

Swandog wrote:

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: I reckon Ash would be more use assisting Harding with the coaching of the existing forward line tomorrow

I think that one of your squad will be hoping that Mike....I'd hate to be the one that lost my spot to a 'blow in'. It wouldn't do lot for the morale of the club.

Hardley a blow in ya clown! He is a 99 game champ of the club with 284 gls

Hasn't played or been interested in playing all year - makes him a blow in ya clown!

Ill send you some of my mothballs so you can go and choke on them

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: Even though we lost, Harding made the right decision not to play him. It wouldn't have made any difference to the result.

Bit of a pity your boys kept "them" in the finals Mike, but I guess we'll have to get used to it for the foreseeable future.

It is only going to get worse next year as those 5 eagles who came in were the difference to the end result let alone having 15 or more of them in 2014!

58shark wrote:

mikeh wrote: Even though we lost, Harding made the right decision not to play him. It wouldn't have made any difference to the result.

Bit of a pity your boys kept "them" in the finals Mike, but I guess we'll have to get used to it for the foreseeable future.

They will be a regular fixture for many years to come, yep get used to east perth domination.

Harding made a complete fool of the Footy Club by boasting Hansen would even be considered.

anchorman wrote: And I thought that the Swans were the only side that would truly test the Tigers!!!!!!!
I guess it was a bad weekend for the Felines,Cats Tigers and Tigers all go down.

A/man have you joined some of the supporters of the club formerly known as East Perth in making puerile comments. Tallan Ames did not say that we were the only ones who could beat Claremont. What he said that we were one of only two teams in the qualifying matches who had beaten Claremont and the other side, Subiaco, did not make the finals. His comments were also based on the HISTORICAL FACT that we have beaten Claremont 4 times out of 4 in Grand Finals.