TOPIC:

they have a right to, would indicate they dont have any brains though as nobody will pay it.

MarkOlsen wrote: they have a right to, would indicate they dont have any brains though as nobody will pay it.

Bingo ! He wasnt purchased for $30k, make no mistake !

MarkOlsen wrote: they have a right to, would indicate they dont have any brains though as nobody will pay it.

Someone will eventually. Didn't look like Swans would get anyone to pay them $20k for Krakouer but eventually they found a sucker.

Barney wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: they have a right to, would indicate they dont have any brains though as nobody will pay it.

Someone will eventually. Didn't look like Swans would get anyone to pay them $20k for Krakouer but eventually they found a sucker.

$15k !

so you keep saying, you also said the money wouldnt be paid to Swans

MarkOlsen wrote: so you keep saying, you also said the money wouldnt be paid to Swans

Im 100% right on both fronts atm !!!

yep, no doubt you are a source to be believed..

MarkOlsen wrote: yep, no doubt you are a source to be believed..

Olly, I detect defeated sarcasm there mate. Lets summarise the points you refer too.

1. Kraks transfer fee is $15k not $20k. (You and the papers have got it horribly wrong)
2. Payment to Swans has not been made.
3. Jarhan Jacky was not sold to Peel for $30k.

4. you missed the point about you saying Swans wouldnt receive any payment for Krak.
5. dont believe everything Brad Bootsma tells you

MarkOlsen wrote: 4. you missed the point about you saying Swans wouldnt receive any payment for Krak.
5. dont believe everything Brad Bootsma tells you

6."you missed the point about you saying Swans wouldnt receive any payment for Krak". WP will gladly pay the fee, Remember I said that !
7. Bootsie didnt tell me the figure payed, the player in question did ! Its common knowledge what the transfer fee was, I am embarrassed for you !