premiership hangover wrote:
kirbs wrote:
premiership hangover wrote: but when the rules have been relaxed once, is that not then the rule going forward?
Why break that rule of allowing players to play but now following that rule the following year
So a kindly traffic Cop who let's you off a speeding ticket with a warning, means if caught again that will happen again ? I don't think so
I do see your point though PH, and do recall years back in SFL, a WAFL boss who many were happy to see depart, told SFL League delegates if a WCE players needed match practice through the finals and his WAFL team was out when the WCE were in finals, they had the authority for him to play SFL if necessary. As this would comprimise the SFL finals, you can guess what the SFL delegates told him what to do.
Interesting argument Kirbs, I don't know the answer as I have never been let of a speeding ticket, however I do know that if this was a case before a judge, based on past rulings, as recent as last year, when the same situation arose and was allowed there is now a legal precedence that the courts would follow.
Yep PH very true as history in courts, I agree with you, my example was just to say not everything is just black and white.
