TOPIC:

Both Fyffe and Nic nat sign on at $800,000 a year. In the derby nic nac zero kcks zero marks, and (obviously) zero goals. Spot the difference!!!

Nic Nat Nicco's good for mark ...

- eting !!!

Yep it's actually comical at the moment. The way McGovern is clunking them I reckon a team like the Bullies or Lions will get the cheque book out. He's a 600k player at the right club

Sacko you should've seen McGovern's little brother play today against Swans, he's a star in the making!

UNKA2 wrote: Both Fyffe and Nic nat sign on at $800,000 a year. In the derby nic nac zero kcks zero marks, and (obviously) zero goals. Spot the difference!!!

Dead right unk and I reckon it's giving you a dead set hard on.
BTW, are your cats on the decline or building up for a grand finish?

Exactly how much is WCE paying NIK NAT?

58shark wrote:

UNKA2 wrote: Both Fyffe and Nic nat sign on at $800,000 a year. In the derby nic nac zero kcks zero marks, and (obviously) zero goals. Spot the difference!!!

Dead right unk and I reckon it's giving you a dead set hard on.
BTW, are your cats on the decline or building up for a grand finish?

nah and nah mate. I call em as i see em. I dont think Nic Nat will ever be a great "footballer" in the AFL.

And the other nah, is i reckon my cats are "goneski", and now we are an "average" afl team

Bazza wrote: Exactly how much is WCE paying NIK NAT?

IF the media is to be believed bout $800,000k a year.

Another week, another UNKA bashing of nic nat.
Get over it mate.

And the other nah, is i reckon my cats are "goneski", and now we are an "average" afl team[/quote]
Geelong have an easier lot of games left this year than Fremantle. They dont seem to finish off teams They are still TOP FOUR unlike my Bombers who should have won.