Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 53

Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Deprecated: strripos(): Non-string needles will be interpreted as strings in the future. Use an explicit chr() call to preserve the current behavior in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65
Welcome, Member
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC:

a message for Abbott/Turnbull and copper wire 10 years 7 months ago #30993

  • shwaborn
  • shwaborn's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 279
  • Thank you received: 0

fish wrote: Please do some research before you state wireless as the saviour to all our problems because its not. Wifi has issues with saturation so the more people connecting to it the slower everyone's internet goes.

More so each mobile tower supporting this standard and any mobile tower currently supporting 3G/4G requires connection to the network which will be currently and going forward running fibre cables. Be that with Optus/Telstra/Vodafone


Obviously you think the internet is the answer to all our problems, so lets throw a squillon at it.
Will someone please give me an example of where our internet currently is causing huge problems?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

a message for Abbott/Turnbull and copper wire 10 years 7 months ago #31011

  • Bazza
  • Bazza's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 10934
  • Thank you received: 1163
4 1/2 years later and only 100,000 premises connected..

37 Billion and counting

The NBN is farcical.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

a message for Abbott/Turnbull and copper wire 10 years 7 months ago #31075

  • swan42
  • Visitor
  • Visitor

shwaborn wrote:

swan42 wrote:

shwaborn wrote: I agree Fish, 'do it once and do it right'.
So logically extrapolating on your reason for waiting perhaps we should wait until say 2040 to see how good the technology is them. Once again we have a Conservative Government has tunnel vision which stops in the 1950s."

It quite spurious to think waiting 6 or 7 years is the same as waiting a generation - '2040'. A bit of child act of exaggeration. I'm not sure comparing the 1950's, 60 odd years ago, to waiting a few years for a cheaper & better technology is accurate.
In fact it is absurd.


The point is at which point do you stop waiting? Presumably if you waited another three years (i.e. 10 years) the technology might be even better.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

Search

Keyword

Who's Online?

We have 249 guests and no members online

Newest Footy Recruits

  • Lost WAFL
  • Duncs1977
  • MrBulldog2020
  • MrBulldog
  • FremantlesFinest