TOPIC:

Sir Edmund Hillary would like to climb that carpet in the Wafc front entry.it's now the size of Olympus Mons on Mars.The largest mountain in the solar system.

The only thing they could of done is replay the game....too much time and effort me thinks....plus not sure SD would get as close again as they did on Sunday TBH....but hey not a good look on the comp and the powers above.......reckon the same could be said in the SANFL too after NA won the prelim with 19 men, then went on to win the flag v Norwood.....

Freezin wrote: The only thing they could of done is replay the game....too much time and effort me thinks....plus not sure SD would get as close again as they did on Sunday TBH....but hey not a good look on the comp and the powers above.......reckon the same could be said in the SANFL too after NA won the prelim with 19 men, then went on to win the flag v Norwood.....

Difference being the SAFC at least have penalised NA with a fine and docked 4 points (2 wins) for next season....what have the weak as water WAFC done?

Besides the obvious BH, because that won't happen... what would be a fair penalty then?....a similar 2 game deduction for next year.....or perhaps the colts coach being stood down for next year from coaching?

Given the infringement was 2 extras behind the ball for a 2 minute period when the pill didn't even go into SD's front half, I think a public stoning at Midland Reserve is the only fair and equitable outcome freez.

BC wrote: Given the infringement was 2 extras behind the ball for a 2 minute period when the pill didn't even go into SD's front half, I think a public stoning at Midland Reserve is the only fair and equitable outcome freez.

One of your plethora illegally behind the ball intercepted at least 2 forward sorties I can remember!

But was the one who intercepted this forward entry x 2 a designated defender or one of the two illegally positioned players....if the former than not sure the problem, if the latter then perhaps that stoning at Midland Reserve might be an appropriate punishment....with BH and Swandog the first stoners.

The vision is self explanatory freez...in the final 2 minutes following Bain's goal, there was one intercept mark by Subi's number 10 Mayo on the wing with 30 seconds to go. There were no entries into SD forward 50 in the last 2 minutes.

What you mean Mayo the $ubi Full Forward took an intercept mark backward of the wing...what was he doing back there?!

thewest.com.au/sport/wafl/duffield-slams...ics-bc-5839579871001

Beasley Hutton wrote: thewest.com.au/sport/wafl/rivals-up-in-a...-final-ng-b88970842z

It was not only the SDFC (at least 5 other WAFL clubs) who noticed the clear breach by the $ubi Colts coach who if Ablett and co at the weak as water WAFC are fair dinkum should at the least face the sack seeing as tho they will not overturn the result or force a replay of the game!

Well if you watched the game swans actually broke the RULES numerous times on the 2 and 3. I dont hear aby of you bringing that up?