TOPIC:

Singha wrote:

BC wrote: Not a bad effort and the thing that gave me most encouragement was that we had no real standouts other than Sokol. I was impressed by our entire backline once again as they are the mainstay of our success. Vermeersch, Cleggert and Walters all good and Dela started well but tapered off a bit. I must say that if that fella Rodgers for Perth practised his acting a bit more he might be up for a Logie....I'd vote for him and obviously the umpires would as well given the frees that paid him for throwing his head in the air when tackled....obviously is a student of Schloithe and Selwood. Also how Bennell got a state game is beyond me...the guy is a liability..anyway...enough of them. A good win with a week and a half rest.

Agreed on Rogers, I’m thankful that Subi doesn’t have a head thrower like him. Very ordinary effort by Sinclair to line up and clean up in the back a defenceless player. Sinclair had no intention of anything other than flattening him. Pissweak

Yes I saw that Singha..Harry Marsh was going for the ball and the Perth player cannoned straight into his back whilst not even looking at the flight of the ball....a gutless sniping act for mine and he was lucky not to be reported. On a positive note, how well is young Braut going? He's a big lump of a kid and at only 22 he's developing nicely under the expert tutelage of Lockyer, Litherland, Heal and Marsh.

Firstly it wasn't Sinclair.

Secondly thesubi player had the ball and was fair game.

Thirdly the contact was entirely legal and a free kick should not have been paid. It was a bump to the side, and was not in the back. It seemed to be a case of the umpire thinking it was a 'bit hard'. It wasn't, it was just normal footy.

Probably you should take Ted's advice and get off the grog Singha.

It was like getting hit with a bag of fairy floss boys the guy had no idea how to bump. I would have to say Subiaco played average, fumbled and couldn’t connect properly. The last quarter was much better to watch. Perth looked like a bottom side.

God help us, one of the alignment idiots wants in, like anyone takes you guys seriously. Give it twenty, maybe thirty years numpty.

Come on love don’t be like that. Is your name Adam?

Stand the Test wrote: God help us, one of the alignment idiots wants in, like anyone takes you guys seriously. Give it twenty, maybe thirty years numpty.

You are an absolute peanut and a waste of space. You have nothing constructive to say ever. Give it away.

Buddy Boy wrote:
You are an absolute peanut and a waste of space. You have nothing constructive to say ever. Give it away.

He is trying to become more balanced around his obsessiveness - by mixing in a dose of hysteria.

I just ignore the clown...he obviously has some issues as you say jack.

Come on without me you guys would have nothing to talk about.

Except maybe whether Sutherland should play or not.

Give it a rest stt.