TOPIC:

Bazza wrote:

Ti Em wrote:

Bazza wrote:

Ti Em wrote:

Bazza wrote: They are all postage stamps compared to Kings Park AND all the Native Species are Devoid, you might as well be walking around pommie land, none of them are a patch on Kings Park especially view wise.

Kings Park is the largest inner city park in the WORLD even bigger than Central Park in NYC, and that is before you get to the hundreds of unique native species it has, that alone craps on anything Melbourne has, a few roses and oak tress you can see in London done better.

You probably should visit Melbourne s parks and gardens first before dismissing them all as inferior Bazza. It is a shame Kings Park alone did not alleviate Perth to numero uno - unfortunately there are other factors to gauge.

I've been to just about all of them and I might as well of been in pommie land, they were designed by homesick Brits to make it look as much like home as possible , in fact most of Melbourne is, probably because the weather was pretty much the same..lol

The Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne were established in 1846. Kings Domain in 1854.Land was reserved for the Fitzroy Gardens in 1848. Captain Cook's Cottage and over 1,000 trees including an avenue of 250 Dutch and English Elms are located there. Yes all built by homesick Brits. Of course that sort of thing did not happen in Perth. Out of curiosity where do you stand on Australia becoming a republic?

Are all boring at batshit and nothing unique, btw, Perth is older than Melbourne.

Anyway wtf is your story you seem obsessed with sticking up for Melbourne, piss off over there if its so great.

As far as the republic goes , Im a proud Australian and like the constution as it is, I base that on political judgemenf not bloody tree species.

Leather Stops wrote: Perth has more WHINGERS per capita than Melbourne.. Most on Oz Footy.