TOPIC:

When a player decides to leave a club for whatever reason is it ok for an official from his previous club to ring him and abuse him for not attending training. The operative word here is abuse. If the players previous club coach is happy with him to move on is it ok for let’s say an official from that club abuse him because he wants to move on. The question I ask? If this scenario is true, is it professional. Does it make any difference if the player is contracted or uncontracted, abuse is abuse. Does it make any difference if a player moves suburbs and he has to play with another club, abuse is abuse. Let’s say junior wants to play at the club his uncle played with and his former player manager abuses him for wanting to move on. Abuse is abuse. That’s my opinion. My above hypothetical statement does not point the finger at any football Club, I’m talking in general. Even the EPFC would never stoop so low.
Now on to another subject. I was told from a friend of mine who supplies me with some fantastic nectarines from Pickering Brook that there is some dissension down at Leederville oval. Young blokes that want to play league footy can’t squeeze in because there are all these big bodies in the way.

Geez Wing mate - too many words for fark's sakes I'm from Freo and can't read long essays
Who & where yay or nay please champion

So Tyler got an unpleasant phone call and went running to his new team to complain about it.

Seems he is fitting in well at his new club!

the ferals cant complain, they have been poaching falcons players for years. hutch was chucked on the scrap heap by the ferals, he came over to decent club and look where is today. tyler my friend, see you in the afl in a couple of years. the falcons will get you there because the regals don't give a f--k about you.

Barney wrote: So Tyler got an unpleasant phone call and went running to his new team to complain about it.

Seems he is fitting in well at his new club!

He wouldn't be complaining Barney, he is in a better place (for now). The big question is whether the WAFC have the balls to step in and tell the Ferals to ease up and acknowledge that they are reaping the rewards from selling their souls. Alignment year 1 - A GF appearance and a profit of $100k (there a bouts ), alignment year 2 - GF appearance and a profit of $350k.

Cmon WAFC, if you let this situation slide, it will officially be labeled a "Shambles"

West Perth promised Hutchy a development job which I think never even happened. Also payed his rent for two years amongst other things. Was a required player at EP but was told with his hip complaint he may have to work in through the reserves. Perhaps EP should have just lied to him but I think it's wrong to mis lead these young blokes. You West Perth guys play fast and loose with the truth that's for sure, carry on like hysterical tarts.

Get a life LB. It's not all about EP. They decided to go with the WCE. got to take the good with the bad.
Hutchy came to WP. Was given the opportunity. Played in a premiership. Got redrafted. Enough said. Probably would not have happened if he went to EP.

No mention of the alignment Frank, just countering another nonsense post about Hutchy. No doubt it was a good move by him as it turns out, how it would have gone at EP we will never Know, but probably quite well due to his work ethic.

AND NOW THE FIGHT REALLY STARTS - MAY THE BETTER MAN WIN - OR WILL IT BE THE BETTER ALIGNED??

West Perth will have to reach an agreement over transfer fees with a defiant East Perth if they are to secure the services of young key-position player Tyler Keitel.
Keitel, 19, has signed a two-year contract to play for the Falcons after being overlooked in the AFL national and rookie drafts, having failed to earn a league berth for the Royals in 2014.

However, the WA Football Commission confirmed yesterday the two clubs would be expected to negotiate a fee for Keitel's transfer given two separate sub-clauses in league regulations were at odds when it came to the AFL hopeful's case.

"He's not contracted and hasn't played senior football in the last two seasons, which would make him eligible for transfer," a WAFC spokesman said. "But he's also 19 years of age and on the club's (restricted) 40 list, which means he'd be ineligible for transfer. A transfer can still happen regardless, but the two clubs have to agree on what the transfer fee is.

"The eligibility determines normally what that fee is, but that's a guideline. It's basically in the clubs' court."

East Perth are intent on retaining Keitel at all costs.

Royals officials are understood to have moved to contract a host of their colts and reserves players over the past week as a precaution in case the WAFC had sided with West Perth's position.

From Todays West Australian ...

The most WP will have to pay $4000.00.