TOPIC:

Freezin wrote:

Still scratching my head why WP coaching team, would let a multitude of 18 -19 yr olds play colts, and then let 4  x 16 yr olds play reserves.....doesn't make sense at all.

That's because it didn't happen. I just went onto the WAFL fixtures and results site and clicked on the profile of every WP reserves player in last week's game against SF and the youngest was 19.  Against Subi there were two 18yo's but certainly no-one aged 16. 

Yeah sounded too bizarre to be true.

I wasn't at the game but I think those kids played v $ubi, no doubt BC will let us know:)

Sorry Mel. I'll type a bit slower for you...against Subi, WP reserves had two 18yo's but no-one aged 16 or 17....but hey, let's not let facts get in the way of bullshit.