TOPIC:

Theouterseagull wrote:

Leedy wrote:

mikeh wrote: According to the West report, the attendance was 2000 (approx). I know these figures are often inaccurate and we will have to wait for the official crowd but if this is true that is a very disappointing crowd for a top of the table clash between 2 unbeaten teams. I think all WAFL supporters need to recognise that our competition is quickly losing its relevance amongst the general public and it will continue to fade away unless something drastic is done. We need to particularly get away from the "my crowd is bigger than your crowd" mentality and admit to ourselves that all clubs attendances are on the decline this year and something needs to be done about it.

Agreed Mike H, the dumb shits at the WAFC can start by fucking off the alignment and run a fine tooth comb through the $FC, that will get the public interested as it will have all clubs on a level playing field

Bring it on, our books are open.

Beasley Hutton wrote:

Theouterseagull wrote:

Leedy wrote:

mikeh wrote: According to the West report, the attendance was 2000 (approx). I know these figures are often inaccurate and we will have to wait for the official crowd but if this is true that is a very disappointing crowd for a top of the table clash between 2 unbeaten teams. I think all WAFL supporters need to recognise that our competition is quickly losing its relevance amongst the general public and it will continue to fade away unless something drastic is done. We need to particularly get away from the "my crowd is bigger than your crowd" mentality and admit to ourselves that all clubs attendances are on the decline this year and something needs to be done about it.

Agreed Mike H, the dumb shits at the WAFC can start by fucking off the alignment and run a fine tooth comb through the $FC, that will get the public interested as it will have all clubs on a level playing field

Bring it on, our books are open.

The only books open at $ubi are the cheque books!