TOPIC:

You obviously don't understand that the AFL and it's tribunal is managed by MGM studios. Can't digress from the script, can we?

anchorman wrote: Is it case of rules for some, but not for others.I am only commenting on the Eagles V Geelong game here. Selwood, still a Brownlow favourite,uses an elbow to the back of the head to Mitchell, who responds. Selwood fined for the what I would call a cowardly hit. I under stand Mitchell getting a fine , but Selwood!!!!!
Shuey, runs over the ball to attack Dangerfield, hits him high,gets a fine.How does that work out... oh that's right he is still in contention for the Brownlow.
There are rules, and then there are rules.

a/man I think the first question the mrp should ask this question first: what would Ballantyne get?

About time common sense prevailed It's footy not netball & good to see all players get to play this week.. some of those "hits" would have dermy Rhys jones & co pi55ing themselves..

Nothing to do with commensense at all. As said its rules for some abd rules for others. Steve J and Ballas would have got 2 weeks for Shueys hit.
Was Shuey hit high YES ( mrp admiited this
Eyes on ball NO
Ran past the ball to take a bloke out YES
MRP said careless, not INTENTIONAL, so he ran past the ball to hit dangerfiled and that wasnt intentional??...spare me.
Ohh and whilst im having a whinge, how about those biased VFL people rubbing those eagles OUT................................. ohhhhh hold on

Based on your comment unka selwood should of got a week then as what you've said Selwood did!

Anchor seriously they were weak as piss hits it's a combat sport nobody got hurt so move on

terror wrote: Based on your comment unka selwood should of got a week then as what you've said Selwood did!

Anchor seriously they were weak as piss hits it's a combat sport nobody got hurt so move on

Yes Selwood should have been suspended. Mind you Thompson from the roos elbowed Dangerfiled in the jaw when he was on the ground and he got fined. I just dont see how Shuey got off.

Yesteryear they all get off and the game goes on. Today's rules Selwood gets a week, Mitchell a fine and Shuey a week.

UNKA2 wrote: Nothing to do with commensense at all. As said its rules for some abd rules for others. Steve J and Ballas would have got 2 weeks for Shueys hit.
Was Shuey hit high YES ( mrp admiited this
Eyes on ball NO
Ran past the ball to take a bloke out YES
MRP said careless, not INTENTIONAL, so he ran past the ball to hit dangerfiled and that wasnt intentional??...spare me.
Ohh and whilst im having a whinge, how about those biased VFL people rubbing those eagles OUT................................. ohhhhh hold on

I think you're developing a vfl shoulder chip Unk!!

58shark wrote: Yesteryear they all get off and the game goes on. Today's rules Selwood gets a week, Mitchell a fine and Shuey a week.

Agreed

58shark wrote:

UNKA2 wrote: Nothing to do with commensense at all. As said its rules for some abd rules for others. Steve J and Ballas would have got 2 weeks for Shueys hit.
Was Shuey hit high YES ( mrp admiited this
Eyes on ball NO
Ran past the ball to take a bloke out YES
MRP said careless, not INTENTIONAL, so he ran past the ball to hit dangerfiled and that wasnt intentional??...spare me.
Ohh and whilst im having a whinge, how about those biased VFL people rubbing those eagles OUT................................. ohhhhh hold on

I think you're developing a vfl shoulder chip Unk!!

Just a bit of payback for the VFL only look after the vic players and clubs 58:lol: