TOPIC:

Demons Forever wrote: Read my post again Swandog.

The rules are the rules why should they change for Nic?

I read it mate and you have got the jist of this post all wrong..we all know the rules regarding playing in the ressies side of the bottom team when their WAFL club has a bye, but the issue posed by Hackdorn was that he was going to be playing LEAGUE with East Perth in the next 2 weeks, a different proposition..i hope its clear to you now finally And Woosha is obviously pushing the panic button madly if he is going to rush a guy who is well underdone into the Eagles side..he should probably play WAFL reserves first up, then WAFL league and the VFL

Interestingly Dog, Langdon mentioned it to Worsfold last night during their interview. He quoted the rule that Nicnat could only play Ressies at another team and not league. Worsfold said yes he can very very quickly, Langdon dropped it like a gun and moved on. Might be interesting to see what happens.

Worsfold's an arrogant prick like the rest of them. Langdon is just a yes man too scared to upset his mates.

If they were somehow able to make this chicanery happen and Nic Nat played at EP, if I was Swannies, I'd be asking for a $15,000 transfer fee from The Royals for him. And if I was Paul Johnson or whoever he (and Lycett) kicked out I'd be asking the WAFC for special dispensation to have an immediate clearance.

isn't Lammie the number one ruckman in the WAFL....why all the NicNat bleating?....harden up SD boys....Lammie would take NicNat to the cleaners....wouldn't he?....NicNat would be sitting on the bench waiting all day for Wes to tire...surplus to requirements me thinks NicNat would be

15K transfer for a fella you don't even pay a penny for in terms of salary....talk about wanting something for nothing....cough up a match day payment/s and perhaps WCE will allow NicNat to wear the zebra stripes when fit!!

Stick to your Crusaders freeze while we discuss real footy topics mate!!

BH....I had a great weekend out the other day at a bar in CHCH, when the Force beat the Crusaders in Perth ......so I guess Big Wes aint the real deal then?......pity that because SwanDog floats his boat quite a lot on these threads.

As for discussing real footy topics...I think you are confusing whinging with discussion mate.....whether it be the umps or Woosha with his SD reared WCE lads, you SD boys get the two concepts mixed up quite a bit ......easily done I know, but NicNat would be an awful waste at the WAFL level.....sort of like SD or RCQ facing against Jimmy Higgs(in his prime) in the local A grade comp, don't you think?.....Jimmy like NicNat is special, once in a life time....too good to be wasting his talents at a lower level!

Freeze totally off topic I know but have they fixed up Jade Stadium (or whatever it is called these days) from the damage the earthquake caused to the ground? Having glanced through the channels on fox sports the other day i noticed the Crusaders were playing at another ground other than Jade.

Talking Footy wrote: Interestingly Dog, Langdon mentioned it to Worsfold last night during their interview. He quoted the rule that Nicnat could only play Ressies at another team and not league. Worsfold said yes he can very very quickly, Langdon dropped it like a gun and moved on. Might be interesting to see what happens.

Worsfold is wrong then as I understand it..does Worsfold run the WAFL now too then? Heaven help us because he aint doing a great job at Wet Toast and probably wont last the year if they keep going South

THe EGirls will win five of their next six so that will keep Worstfold in a job for a while. 5/6; unlike their reserves who could quite possibly go 1/6 ...
(without NicNat)