TOPIC:

Afraid so Grassy

Agree the SANFL rules are much more fair

m.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/2017-08-28/...-finals-who-can-play

Port have made the GF but were a strong club before the alignment unlike the dribble dished up by Peel

Dorrington says lots of things to spin things a certain way. He thought Weststar rules was a good idea. WAFC should be listening to the fans more than anything else. Clubs are hard pressed to say anything or they get whacked

Country member wrote: Just for interest sake, under SANFL rules, Fremantle reserves could not select at least Sheridan, Logue, Ibbotson, Suban or Sutcliffe. That's just players who've played more AFL than WAFL this year. Not sure which players have played more than 3 WAFL games since June 30 but I'd imagine the list of ineligible players would grow with that rule also considered. That'd make a substantially different team and a substantially different competition.

I'm a Freo supporter but I was reading the article yesterday talking about this rule in the SANFL. Off the top of my head if a player had played 8 or more AFL games throughout the season and had played less than three SANFL games after June 30th they weren't allowed to play. I personally think this is a rule that should be implemented in the WAFL.