TOPIC:

swan42 wrote:

chaddy22 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: I only listed the WAFL clubs as the 2 AFL Reserves teams ceased to exist in my record books!

So BH how does your system work if they don't exist.I assume You don't include the free kicks for and against the swannies when you play them.I suppose you only have a G7 premiership table as well.Looks like making the top 5 in a seven team comp is looking gtood for the swannies.

C22 Swan Districts Football Club live and well; East Perth exists in name only. I understand why you are so bitter and twisted.

Swan42 are you Tony Abbott in disguise.He also has a habit of repeating himself.I'm not bitter or twisted but mildly amused by you swanny posters.

chaddy22 wrote:

swan42 wrote:

chaddy22 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: I only listed the WAFL clubs as the 2 AFL Reserves teams ceased to exist in my record books!

So BH how does your system work if they don't exist.I assume You don't include the free kicks for and against the swannies when you play them.I suppose you only have a G7 premiership table as well.Looks like making the top 5 in a seven team comp is looking gtood for the swannies.

C22 Swan Districts Football Club live and well; East Perth exists in name only. I understand why you are so bitter and twisted.

Swan42 are you Tony Abbott in disguise.He also has a habit of repeating himself.I'm not bitter or twisted but mildly amused by you swanny posters.

I am most assuredly NOT Abbott. I suppose you need to find humour where you can get it given your support of the club formerly known as East Perth.

swan42 wrote:

chaddy22 wrote:

swan42 wrote:

chaddy22 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: I only listed the WAFL clubs as the 2 AFL Reserves teams ceased to exist in my record books!

So BH how does your system work if they don't exist.I assume You don't include the free kicks for and against the swannies when you play them.I suppose you only have a G7 premiership table as well.Looks like making the top 5 in a seven team comp is looking gtood for the swannies.

C22 Swan Districts Football Club live and well; East Perth exists in name only. I understand why you are so bitter and twisted.

Swan42 are you Tony Abbott in disguise.He also has a habit of repeating himself.I'm not bitter or twisted but mildly amused by you swanny posters.

I am most assuredly NOT Abbott. I suppose you need to find humour where you c
an get it given your support of the club formerly known as East Perth.

you might be right swan42.Abbott has a bigger deficit then you guys at swans.

Beasley Hutton wrote: Interestingly with the general bye this week a good chance to do a free kick tally (for and against) ladder to this point of the season ...fair to say it makes for some interesting reading (but not surprising to some)!

1. WP +39
2. SF +27
3. CL +24
4. EF +19
5. PH -2

6. SD -8
7. $U -22

Updated after today-

1. CL +43 (+19 today)
2. WP +39
3. SF +27
4. EF +19
5. PH +11 (+13 today)

6. SD -21 (-13 today)
7. $U -22

Good try Bh but you forgot to add in the Round 9 free kick tallies!

It was a bye last week for the state game mate.

so peel got absolutely smashed on the free kick count today. from what I heard on the radio our pressure was very impressive and I reckon 9 or 10 of those free kicks were for holding the ball. the commentators couldn't believe how bad peel were. I reckon they kicked it out on the full 5 or 6 times also.

BH You're making as many errors as allegedly the umpires make. Please review your decision making as you have conveniently omitted the free kick count from the Round prior to the State Game. Then again there are lies , damn lies and statistics
,

Yes listened in the game in patches and the 91.3 commentators keep commenting on how bad Peel were considering the Ruckmen they had and the team.
Words like pathetic and not interested came up.
They said if these guys were playing for a place in the Dockers they had no chance on their performance.
Not taking anything From Claremont and they are hot. Won in the Ruck all day from what I heard against good Ruckmen

Sad really and I can see why Cam Shepard and the president will be going at the end of the year. Both have had things to say that the WAFC wouldnt of liked on the situation.

Hmmm WAFC Pres will come in and a Dockers Coach.. Webb? who knows anyone who wants a good pay packet doesnt have to do anything except listen to what they are told by the Dockers staff will get the job.. The word coach will not apply to the person doing it as he will not actually be coaching the side.

SAD

EP and Peel just there to give their returning AFL players a run and nothing else matters especially the WAFL COMP.

Had to laugh when one commentator said at least 3 CLA players would of been selected on their efforts for next weeks game IF THEY WERE IN THE DOCKERS CAMP... Peel should be so strong with their injury list being low and the top 22 being assured of a spot.

Custodian wrote: BH You're making as many errors as allegedly the umpires make. Please review your decision making as you have conveniently omitted the free kick count from the Round prior to the State Game. Then again there are lies , damn lies and statistics
,

I did the original tally after the completion of round 9 mate as I said at the time and I quote "with the general bye this week now is a good time to do a free kick tally (for and against) ladder to this point of the season".
I have now updated from yesterday's games ...comprehend?