TOPIC:

go for it Grump - I couldnt care less whether its a wafl club, ammo, country or whatever posting their raffle info.
as long as it supporting grassroots footy then good with me.

BC agree to an extent but the Swandog behaviour is applified in another form by others BH is not a good bloke as you refer to him he is in the same league as the others Swan42 is so so but is blinded by his myopic view of things to the point of paranoia he acts as try hard itelligence sound board for the lesser light and ecouraging then rather then calming then I do agree Mike is a voice of rare reason

This could be a could site if ran out of the sdfc prism sadly George seem reluctant to take affirmative action to control serious breaches

BC you might notice considerable decline on this blog from users of non sdfc bent I have even noticed far fewer posts from yourself the afl blogs are dead despite this being a huge time locally most of the wafl club threads are drying up if not for the wpfc jumper fiasco not much would be happening.

As evidenced by the maturity of the debate on this thread it's by sdfc leading lights
no wonder.

BC wrote: i guess if you look past the swanscentricity of this site, its still a pretty good vehicle to have discussions on the WAFL. i just ignore the more rabid and vitriolic of the bogans such as Swandog as to me they exemplify your typical bogandean inmate. mike is the voice of reason, 42 is good for a laugh or two but wish he'd swallow his thesaurus, BH and MO seem pretty decent and passionate WAFL people....but I do take your point Grump that if it's good enough for SD to advertise their raffle on here then the other clubs should be able to do likewise.

Swancentricity?? Some of you $ubi blokes (mainly you BC and Outer) are the ones obsessed with trolling the SD forum and love to sling shit but when it comes back you whinge, moan & cannot handle it! Maybe us bogans are just made of sterner stuff than you handbags, I bet if you were a cricketer you would be the first to complain because the opposition were sledging you..there are some decent $ubi posters like DG and Senior though, but I am prepared to cut you and Outer some slack Sometimes the discussion is very robust like the front bar at a pub..suck it up !

I dont think George and co would have any objection in other clubs promoting their raffles on here

Swandog wrote:

BC wrote: i guess if you look past the swanscentricity of this site, its still a pretty good vehicle to have discussions on the WAFL. i just ignore the more rabid and vitriolic of the bogans such as Swandog as to me they exemplify your typical bogandean inmate. mike is the voice of reason, 42 is good for a laugh or two but wish he'd swallow his thesaurus, BH and MO seem pretty decent and passionate WAFL people....but I do take your point Grump that if it's good enough for SD to advertise their raffle on here then the other clubs should be able to do likewise.

Swancentricity?? Some of you $ubi blokes (mainly you BC and Outer) are the ones obsessed with trolling the SD forum and love to sling shit but when it comes back you whinge, moan & cannot handle it! Maybe us bogans are just made of sterner stuff than you handbags, I bet if you were a cricketer you would be the first to complain because the opposition were sledging you..there are some decent $ubi posters like DG and Senior though, but I am prepared to cut you and Outer some slack Sometimes the discussion is very robust like the front bar at a pub..suck it up !

thanks SD....your approval means everything to me..I can sleep easy now.

BC wrote: i guess if you look past the swanscentricity of this site, its still a pretty good vehicle to have discussions on the WAFL. i just ignore the more rabid and vitriolic of the bogans such as Swandog as to me they exemplify your typical bogandean inmate. mike is the voice of reason, 42 is good for a laugh or two but wish he'd swallow his thesaurus, BH and MO seem pretty decent and passionate WAFL people....but I do take your point Grump that if it's good enough for SD to advertise their raffle on here then the other clubs should be able to do likewise.

BC it would be very hard to swallow; but glad to brighten up your day.

Bazza wrote: BC agree to an extent but the Swandog behaviour is applified in another form by others BH is not a good bloke as you refer to him he is in the same league as the others Swan42 is so so but is blinded by his myopic view of things to the point of paranoia he acts as try hard itelligence sound board for the lesser light and ecouraging then rather then calming then I do agree Mike is a voice of rare reason

This could be a could site if ran out of the sdfc prism sadly George seem reluctant to take affirmative action to control serious breaches

BC you might notice considerable decline on this blog from users of non sdfc bent I have even noticed far fewer posts from yourself the afl blogs are dead despite this being a huge time locally most of the wafl club threads are drying up if not for the wpfc jumper fiasco not much would be happening.

As evidenced by the maturity of the debate on this thread it's by sdfc leading lights
no wonder.

Do you know me personally do you Constable Care?
Out of interest how many WAFL football topics have you actually created Chris?
You seem to want to constantly fire bullets from your police issued revolver all with a very negative slant at wa footy and do not want to listen to anyone else who may actually have the facts at first hand ...if you are so personally unhappy with this site why dont you move on?
Or even try for once after nearly 3000 posting something on a positive note for a bloody change rather than bag anyone who has a passion for their particular club and the comp we play in and now it's the site we all read and post on ..the same site George & Mike created in their own time as passionate Swans & WAFL blokes as a necessity to replace the now defunct Footygoss and you still bag them and the rest of us that at least try and keep the passionate WAFL chat ticking!

The prosecution rests.

administrators, what will you do with this blatant serious breach of blog protocol, i.e. an obvious attempt to reveal someones personal identity on an online forum??

Answers admin????

This has been raised with you directly in the past , as idicated above NO ACTION has been taken to resolve it or santion a repeat perpetrator

Answers admin???

Will BH be held to account.,,??

Also please PM the address of this blogs registered office.

Well said BH and Anchor....Bazza must be one negative individual

I reckon he's a good bloke personally given we share common views on a lot of things. everyone brings something to this site whether they're positive, negative or somewhere in between. my take is that if you don't like what is being said on here then just ignore it but the fact remains that to even post on this site indicates to me that you're passionate on promoting the WAFL and that can't be a bad thing no matter what it is you're throwing up. any discussion about the WAFL being good, bad or indifferent is better than nothing at all.