TOPIC:

which of the older ones are you thinking about Danger ?
certainly Wilson, Cameron and Bain who have all played league look as though they are working on a strength program..
which of the 18 or 19 year olds havnt done much work ? Farrant certainly looks as though he hasnt put on a kilo but maybe has that wiry build.

Danger how many over age (born in 1999) Colts boys did $ubi have compared to SD?
It makes a big difference in underage footy having that extra year to grow and develop....the question needs to be asked of the “Super Colts Managers” are the other mob playing in the right spirit by having more than double every other WAFL club with over aged boys playing in their Colts side every week?
Having said that I have gone on record as saying I would like the whole playing squad League-Development level having a major focus on strength and conditioning, fitness, diet etc going forward if we are to compete with the likes of $ubi at senior football.

BH why can't Subi colts play best available?....considering Subi are so strong in their senior teams where should these eligible Subi over agers play then?...is it in the right spirit these guys should be excluded from playing in the WAFL comp then for their chosen club? It is not these players fault that Subi's depth is so bloody good.....

Beasley Hutton wrote: Danger how many over age (born in 1999) Colts boys did $ubi have compared to SD?
It makes a big difference in underage footy having that extra year to grow and develop....the question needs to be asked of the “Super Colts Managers” are the other mob playing in the right spirit by having more than double every other WAFL club with over aged boys playing in their Colts side every week?
Having said that I have gone on record as saying I would like the whole playing squad League-Development level having a major focus on strength and conditioning, fitness, diet etc going forward if we are to compete with the likes of $ubi at senior football.

14 to or 4!

Grump wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: Danger how many over age (born in 1999) Colts boys did $ubi have compared to SD?
It makes a big difference in underage footy having that extra year to grow and develop....the question needs to be asked of the “Super Colts Managers” are the other mob playing in the right spirit by having more than double every other WAFL club with over aged boys playing in their Colts side every week?
Having said that I have gone on record as saying I would like the whole playing squad League-Development level having a major focus on strength and conditioning, fitness, diet etc going forward if we are to compete with the likes of $ubi at senior football.

14 to or 4!

What rules have been broken? Plus can you confirm your numbers??? think you might be a bit off.

jonnyboy wrote:

Grump wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: Danger how many over age (born in 1999) Colts boys did $ubi have compared to SD?
It makes a big difference in underage footy having that extra year to grow and develop....the question needs to be asked of the “Super Colts Managers” are the other mob playing in the right spirit by having more than double every other WAFL club with over aged boys playing in their Colts side every week?
Having said that I have gone on record as saying I would like the whole playing squad League-Development level having a major focus on strength and conditioning, fitness, diet etc going forward if we are to compete with the likes of $ubi at senior football.

14 to or 4!

What rules have been broken? Plus can you confirm your numbers??? think you might be a bit off.

As far as I understand it no rules broken, it is a comment abt the the relative experience and exposure that boys born in 99 have over even the ones born in 00, just a couple of months can have an impact.

The numbers are far as I counted on Sunday from the Budget.

the question should be why did Swans play only 4 rather than how come Subi played 14?

BC wrote: the question should be why did Swans play only 4 rather than how come Subi played 14?

I don't think anyone and certainly not me is shooting at Subi just that it does help to explain some outcomes in colts football

No rules broken- but there'll be a cap on 19 year olds next year. Not many of Subiaco 14 will go anywhere

Exactly KC....the jump from colts to seniors has always been a decent one.....TBH many of those Subi 14 over agers will be lost to WAFL footy next year because of Subi's plethora of depth.....why not let them play whilst they can.....would love to see the stats of colts over agers actually going on to play league footy at their respective club....I know a few of EF over agers in their 2017 colts flag winning team either played ammos or moved back to Gero this year.....and EF depth was decimated this year thru injury......not sure what all the fuss is.....