Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 53

Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Deprecated: strripos(): Non-string needles will be interpreted as strings in the future. Use an explicit chr() call to preserve the current behavior in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 69
Welcome, Member
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC:

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 10 months ago #148252

  • Leather Stops
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1370
  • Thank you received: 109
About time someone high up was found guilty of knowing about child abuse & doing nothing about it.
Hope next to go is George Pell. These people think they are God.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 10 months ago #148255

  • swan42
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
LS have you heard of the legal concept of sub judice?

It would be very judicious if you edit your original post and maybe delete the last two sentences.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by swan42.

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 1 month ago #164311

  • Leather Stops
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1370
  • Thank you received: 109

swan42 wrote: LS have you heard of the legal concept of sub judice?

It would be very judicious if you edit your original post and maybe delete the last two sentences.

Now official that Geo Pell is found guilty & will most likely dumped by the Pope.
Decision was late last year but a ban was placed on this until today.
I googled it & got the news before Xmas but couldn't print it.
Just shows how far the church will go to defend these pediphiles.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 1 month ago #164313

  • robberdog
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 195
  • Thank you received: 8
not defending him ...but hay 40 years ago 2 13 year alter boys were caught drinking alter wine,someone then sprung them and 'rooted' them.....13 year olds drinking wine would be pissed after 2 or 3 gulps..just wonder what other priests were at that church as well....may be another dirty fiddler church person in the right place with 2 pissed 13 year olds.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 1 month ago #164322

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

robberdog wrote: not defending him ...but hay 40 years ago 2 13 year alter boys were caught drinking alter wine,someone then sprung them and 'rooted' them.....13 year olds drinking wine would be pissed after 2 or 3 gulps..just wonder what other priests were at that church as well....may be another dirty fiddler church person in the right place with 2 pissed 13 year olds.


Wasnt it they "wine"they give out after communions etc, thats what i read somewhere, not sure any alcahol in it anyway??\
Besides that the scum bag covered up other pedeos, for that in itself he should rot in hell

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 1 month ago #164323

  • Bazza
  • Bazza's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 10894
  • Thank you received: 1161
Sth Australian Bishop Guilty? - Er no , he was cleared on appeal.

Pell has will also be appealing,

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 1 month ago #164324

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

Bazza wrote: Sth Australian Bishop Guilty? - Er no , he was cleared on appeal.

Pell has will also be appealing,


The Catholic mafia in full swing no doubt

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 1 month ago #164326

  • Bazza
  • Bazza's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 10894
  • Thank you received: 1161

UNKA2 wrote:

Bazza wrote: Sth Australian Bishop Guilty? - Er no , he was cleared on appeal.

Pell has will also be appealing,


The Catholic mafia in full swing no doubt


What catholic mafia? you trying to say our courts of appeal are full of mafia?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 1 month ago #164328

  • Senior Seagull
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 5294
  • Thank you received: 836
So Pell's been found guilty of being a child rapist and pedo, he is appealing which is every persons right and the financial might of the church of Rome will be right behind him as it seems the old cardinals still haven't come to terms with the idea that child rape is a crime. Fingers crossed the outcome gives justice to those innocents that have suffered decades of mental and physical torture by the church. If this decision is upheld on appeal, Pell should not just be "defrocked", he should be excommunicated, anything else is an insult to the victims.

I like what some of the protesters have done by putting up crime scene ribbons around catholic churches, simple but powerful image.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Sth Aust Archbishop GUILTY 5 years 1 month ago #164336

  • BC
  • BC's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 8947
  • Thank you received: 1543
Now that the verdict is out I must say I'm a bit surprised he was found guilty based on the evidence as we know it. In saying that, it appears quite a bit of the graphic detail has been withheld by the press and not reported but notwithstanding that, there's a few unanswered questions which cause me some uncertainty such as you'd think there'd be others as well who Pell had molested since it's taken until recently for this to come out, would he take such a risk in an area where he could quite easily be caught....why did this jury take the unsupported and unverified version of one person over Pell when the burden of proof is beyond reasonable doubt and the first jury weren't all convinced? There just seems to be too many loose ends which imo opinion will see him acquitted on appeal...in saying that, the jury has spoken and the legal system has made a decision which hopefully will give some comfort to other victims and make future predators think twice.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Search

Keyword

Who's Online?

We have 232 guests and no members online

Newest Footy Recruits

  • MiltonRutty
  • BhoblhRhync
  • MRanker - Fiverr
  • whatoma
  • RobertPes