TOPIC:

Peter North wrote:

BC wrote: you're wasting your time trying to talk sense with this arse wipe SS.

Lol its not a case of talking sense you self entitled flog, or are you saying those stats are wrong, and I did say the Schofield talk was rumour.

Maybe the lesson is to wait until you hear the facts before making yourself look like a fool again.

Senior Seagull wrote:

Peter North wrote:

BC wrote: you're wasting your time trying to talk sense with this arse wipe SS.

Lol its not a case of talking sense you self entitled flog, or are you saying those stats are wrong, and I did say the Schofield talk was rumour.

Maybe the lesson is to wait until you hear the facts before making yourself look like a fool again.

The only fools I see are self entitled flogs who think they were somehow disadvantaged against Peel, and think they have support from the WAFL community, although I'll give you Grassy lol

Grassy wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote: Subi had the better of the whistle 24 to 12, so double the frees, not quite as bad as last year which was 19 to 6, over 3 times difference and only 1 Subi free after 1/4 time, so lets get some perspective. Each team has had a good deal from the umps but only 1 team was loaded with full-timers and only 1 team won both GF's. Good thing is it leaves the WAFC no place to hide re the rorted player qualification rules which look likely to be limited to 11 with the additional rule of more WAFL than AFL games, unless Freo make the finals .... bahahahahahahah.

Can't get within a Bull's Roar of Finals,let alone do much else in the AWFULL Competition.So I guess they had to try the old trick of Stackin' their RessiesTeam, to accompany their Wooden Spoon or 2,with desperately needed silverware.

Damn should of gone on a systematic doping program, kicked out of the finals ,suspended for a year and the captain gets his Brownlow taken off him.

Grassy why are you still melting over yesterday there's some cream at the chemist you can get for your butthurt

Well done Peel. From a neutral, thought it has a good, hard game. Subi looked like marching away in the 3rd but couldn't score. Some very lopsided stats in favour of Subi. Peel were always going to be hard to score against.

Sour grapes by Schofield.... Not much of a coach for mine. As for the Peel Dockers....what a joke. The WAFL is DEAD!!!

BC wrote: you're talking to yourself as you have no supporters...enjoy..another cup in Freo's locker.

Gracious in defeat not your strong suit BC?

Dirty Weekender wrote:

Rookie draft wrote: What a fantastic effort to come from 3 goals down. Backs to the wall stuff. The boys showed tremendous heart and I will to win despite a number of injured soldiers. Lost Dawson early after he started well and Deluca got what looked like a bad cork.

I thought this was a better win than last year. Didn't get the fireworks I was expecting but it was a hard fought contested game. Got screwed over all day by the umps. Not sure what the free kick count was but Fark me it would have been well in Subi's favour. The Wheeler free and goal just before quarter time was dead set holding the ball. Think the WAFC wanted Subi to win to justify rule change from last year.

Crowd was excellent given the weather and who was playing. To Subi's credit they tried hard all day. Thought Horsley Kitchen and Phelan were their best.

Lawlers and Subans tackling and pressure was outstanding. Bennell was cool and controlled down back with Luke Ryan and Collins. Nyhuis did another good job on Liam Ryan. Taberner was mauled all day but still did a good job hanging on to a few marks and kicking 2 goals.

Going to be a huge night.

RD...are you seriously suggesting the WAFC tried to manipulate the result of the match? Do you honestly believe they sat the umpires down and suggested they umpire to aid Subi? Are you suggesting it was not an even playing field out there if so? For what it's worth I thought the umpiring was abysmal and one sided and would like your honest opinion as I was not at the ground.

My answer to your questions is no however I do think the WAFC would have preferred Subi to win to justify the alignment qualification rules for finals.

I thought the umpiring was poor with Subiaco well and truely getting the rub of the green

Rookie draft wrote:

BC wrote: you're talking to yourself as you have no supporters...enjoy..another cup in Freo's locker.

Gracious in defeat not your strong suit BC?

There is a certain degree of exquisite irony the feigned indignation of Subiaco fans given their obvious advantage over the rest of the non-aligned clubs.

As a matter of interest did all the players go back to Mandurah on Sunday evening?

Rookie draft wrote:

BC wrote: you're talking to yourself as you have no supporters...enjoy..another cup in Freo's locker.

Gracious in defeat not your strong suit BC?

Being gracious in winning not yours either as I recall you referring to the "lesson" Freo taught Subi last year when the margin was only 23 points.

BC wrote:

Rookie draft wrote:

BC wrote: you're talking to yourself as you have no supporters...enjoy..another cup in Freo's locker.

Gracious in defeat not your strong suit BC?

Being gracious in winning not yours either as I recall you referring to the "lesson" Freo taught Subi last year when the margin was only 23 points.

Hardly BC - I made that comment in jest after you commented on a post titled 'Lessons Learnt" about 10 months after we won the 2016 premiership. The link is below if you care to refresh your memory.

ozfooty.net/joomla16/index.php?option=co...5&id=7244&Itemid=312

Swan42 - I was pretty smashed by the time I got to the club but everyone seemed to be there.