TOPIC:

I saw that the Eagles were looking at him, but you’d have to wonder why a club in rebuild would take a delisted player?

Fair point 58. I really rated him for a long while, and "thought" he was hard done by. BUT this year he had chances, and whilst he is quite skilled and a tidy footballer, his lack of intent and hard running showed up on a LOT of occassions.
I dont think getting him is a step forward for you guys personally

58shark wrote:

I saw that the Eagles were looking at him, but you’d have to wonder why a club in rebuild would take a delisted player?

Elementary Shark, because he is young (about 22) and talented and would slip neatly into the Eagles midfield. He was delisted by the premier AFL side that is just overflowing with talent. What he is not is a 26/27yo from a struggling team and who would be a useful top-up player.
 

Narkle turns 25 in December. He would be no more than a depth player at any AFL club. His appeal might be that he could be selected with a very low pick (or rookie) and paid base salary plus match payments. 

Ted, I think that someone would pick him up. If he misses out on another chance at AFL he would be handy back at Perth.