TOPIC:

Southrlegends wrote: Thanks mate I'm
A tad disappointed however, when a bogan chick
Says she wants a 'sesh' behind the sheds, I was thinking it was going to be a lot more fun? Oh well maybe I will grab a couple of Emus & join her who knows hey????

Think a couple of azithromycins may be more apt than those Emu's mate..tho alcohol is a cheap sanitizer...good luck with your outing this arvo tho....your performance could be the deciding factor on which of the bruvva's comes out on top.....game on

Not quite 3/4 but this has been a fantastic performance from Swan Districts today - they'll beat us well I'm going to say this far out

What's going on here?? South have heaps more kicks, handballs and marks as well as 6 more inside 50's but Swans are double their score. Very strange.

Godinoz wrote: What's going on here?? South have heaps more kicks, handballs and marks as well as 6 more inside 50's but Swans are double their score. Very strange.

Great question anyone got the answer

Swans to be a force this year

Have to take the chances you create & respect the footy when you have possession of it.
Full marks to Swans they nailed it we didn't today

Well done SD it seemed like the ducks bought their A game and the Bulldogs played like poodles

Anyone who was at the game care to provide an update , I had a family engagement and could not make it yesterday. It seems like a fair portion of the team did not make it too Basso yesterday also.
Saunders , Shaw , Deloio 0 goals .....

Well that was a dissapointing day on tne back of last week.

Swan Districts followed the oldest practice in footy - they used the pill when they got it.
Their defence smothered our forwards & their experienced blokes picked us off when we coughed it up mate
Still Kells & Verrier were great , Schloithe Pickett & Cooky & Solomon got taps
Tough run coming so it's good we'll see what falls out of the tree

Ames and notte shut down our forward line, that was the problem, plenty of the footy, but hit a road block.